It is likely to be the optimal choice for most users. However, with any change in format of a file there are often irregularities, so do not expect 100 accuracy in rendering with such transfers in either direction. Just because these suites can open a certain file format doesn’t mean they can save in that file format.
LibreOffice can both read and write these formats. Both OpenOffice and LibreOffice are capable of opening a huge range of file formats, though OpenOffice is in fact capable of opening documents in a wider range of formats than LibreOffice (103 to LibreOffice’s 73). Advise LibreOffice as the free option for locally installed software. by RoryOF Mon 3:11 pm OpenOffice can read (to an extent) the MS Office docx, xlsx and pptx files, but cannot write them. So, the logical conclusion to your question is to continue your current practice. Must use that whenever I am working on documents in collaboration with workmates.) The general consensus between the two is, as your habit has been, to recommend LibreOffice. (I also have O365 available, and the MS applications installed, for when I need MS compatibility. I use that as long as nothing dictates otherwise.
I like the appearance and functionality of Apache OpenOffice, and do not find it lacking in any areas of great significance. Some functionality is only available in installed applications, but much of that falls in the "special needs" category.Īs for differences between LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice, the former has a more active development, which among other things also provides better support for MS Office formats, but reports of stability issues are slightly more frequent than for the latter. Cloud support has its advantages, so your order of priority makes sense.
0 kommentar(er)
